Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112259›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Assessment of probiotic efficacy and anticancer activities of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ESSG1 (MZ683194.1) and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus ESSG2 (MZ683195.1) isolated from dairy products.

Sawsan A Abd Ellatif, Nahla Alsayed Bouqellah, Marwa M Abu-Serie, Elsayed S Abdel Razik, Ameena A Al-Surhanee, Ahmad El Askary, Ghadir E Daigham, Amira Y Mahfouz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sawsan A Abd EllatifBioprocess development Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt.
Nahla Alsayed BouqellahScience College, Biology Department, Taibah University, 42317- 8599, Al-Madinah Al-Munawara, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Marwa M Abu-SerieMedical Biotechnology Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), the City of Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt.
Elsayed S Abdel RazikPlant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications, New Borg El-Arab, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ameena A Al-SurhaneeBiology Department, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka, 2014, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad El AskaryDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadir E DaighamBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls Branch), Cairo, Egypt.
Amira Y MahfouzBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Girls Branch), Cairo, Egypt. amira.mohamed@azhar.edu.eg.
City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EGAl-Azhar University · EGAl Jouf University · SATaibah University · SATaif University · SA

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/82), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia. Project number (TURSP-2020/82)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to antibiotics is on the rise, and its indiscriminate usage has resulted in human and animal management constraints. In the research for an innovative treatment to diminish antimicrobial resistance, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) throw light on diminishing this problem in public health. As a result, this paper looked at the efficacy of LAB isolates and their active metabolites to combat pathogens, reduce antibiotic use in clinical settings, and explore the anticancer potential of 8 strains of LAB isolated from dairy products. Antifungal and antibacterial potential of LAB isolates against selected crop pathogenic fungi and food pathogenic bacteria had been estimated. Results revealed that all isolates exert antioxidant efficacy relating to DPPH, NO scavenging ability, reducing power, superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical, and anti-lipid peroxidation potential. Additionally, 12B isolate exert the highest anticancer upshot with IC

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsCaco-2 CellsDairy ProductsHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntioxidantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntibacterialAnticancerAntifungalAntioxidantLactiplantibacillus pentosus Caco-2 cell lineLactiplantibacillus plantarum

Identifiers

PMID35112259
OpenAlexW4210596261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.