ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022
Posteriorly positioned femoral grafts decrease long-term failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral and tibial graft positions did not affect long-term reported outcome.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- No Difference in 10- to 14-Year Outcomes After Modified Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Large magnetic resonance imaging-based medial posterior tibial slope is associated with time-dependent worsening of rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The posterior femoral cartilage can be used as an anatomical reference for the creation of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Superior reproducibility and femoral tunnel angulation with hybrid transtibial vs. anteromedial portal techniques in ACL reconstruction: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Lower button-cortex distance and lower revision rates with adjustable-loop compared to fixed-loop cortical suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Anterior Slope-Modifying Osteotomies Alter the Length Change Behavior of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament: A Biomechanical Study.The American journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Proximally positioned femoral grafts decrease passive anterior tibial subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a posterior trans-septal portal.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- App-based analysis of the femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction using the quadrant method.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Recurrent Instability Rate and Subjective Knee Function following Accelerated Rehabilitation after ACL Reconstruction in Comparison to a Conservative Rehabilitation Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon versus quadriceps tendon with bone block.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- ACL surgery: reasons for failure and management.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect that femoral and tibial tunnel positions have on long-term reported and clinical outcome and to identify a safe zone based on favourable outcome.
methodsSeventy-eight patients from a previous randomised controlled trial were included and were followed with a mean follow-up of 11.4 years. All patients had primary trans-tibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed. The femoral and tibial tunnel positions were visualised and translated in percentages with three-dimensional computed tomography post-operatively. There were 3 separate outcome variables: patient-reported outcome measured with the IKDC Subjective Knee Form, overall failure, and radiographic osteoarthritis. The correlation between tunnel aperture positions and outcome was determined with multivariate regression. The area with best outcome was defined as the safe zone and was determined with Youden's index in conjunction with receiver operating characteristics.
resultsNo significant relationship was found between tunnel aperture positions and IKDC Subjective Knee Form at 10-year follow-up. The posterior-to-anterior femoral tunnel aperture position parallel to Blumensaat line showed a significant relationship (p = 0.03) to overall failure at 10-year follow-up. The mean posterior-to-anterior tunnel position of the group that did not fail was 37.7% compared to 44.1% in the overall failure group. Femoral tunnel apertures placed further anteriorly had more overall failures at long-term. The cut-off point lies at 35.0% from posterior-to-anterior parallel to Blumensaat. Of the 16 overall failures, 15 (93.8%) were placed further anteriorly than the cut-off point. No significant relationship was found between tunnel aperture positions and radiographic osteoarthritis.
conclusionFemoral and tibial tunnel positions were not associated with long-term patient-reported outcome and radiographic osteoarthritis. Long-term overall failure was more frequently seen in patients with a more anteriorly placed femoral tunnel. This study identified a safe zone located at the most posterior 35% of the femoral condyle parallel to Blumensaat. This knowledge offers guidance to surgeons to operate more precisely and accurately and reconstruct a long-lasting graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.