Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112005›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2021

A Pilot Study on The Effect of a Novel Feed Additive Containing Exogenous Enzymes, Acidifiers, Sodium Butyrate and Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles on Selected Cellular Immune Indices and Body Weight Gains of Calves.

Ewelina Szacawa, Katarzyna Dudek, Dariusz Bednarek, Marek Pieszka, Dorota Bederska-Łojewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ewelina SzacawaDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland.
Katarzyna DudekDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland.
Dariusz BednarekDepartment of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland.
Marek PieszkaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice, Poland.
Dorota Bederska-ŁojewskaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rearing of calves is a difficult period for farmers due to health problems to which the animals are prone this time. Since the use of antibiotics as growth promoters has been forbidden, various innovative feed additives have been tested in many countries around the world. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, experimental (E) calves were supplemented with a novel feed additive consisting of the pancreatic-like enzymes protease and lipase, a fat-coated mixture of organic fumaric, malic, citric and sorbic acids, sodium butyrate and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Control (C) calves received feed without additive. During the supplementation, white blood cell (WBC) counts with leukocyte differentiation, percentages of B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes and their subpopulations, phagocytic activity and oxidative burst of circulating monocytes and granulocytes were examined. Body weight (b.w.) gains of the calves were also monitored.

resultsThe WBC counts in the E and C calves were within the reference ranges throughout the study. In the analysis of the percentages of the lymphocyte subpopulations, phagocytic activity and oxidative burst, no statistically significant differences were reported between the E and C groups. However, higher average daily body weight gains were obtained for the E calves.

conclusionThe study revealed that the examined feed additive did not modulate the immune response of the calves significantly. The tendency to higher daily average b.w. gains in the E calves than in the C calves suggests a beneficial effect of this feed additive.

Indexed as

average daily body weight gainscalvesfeed additiveimmune response

Identifiers

PMID35112005
PMCPMC8775742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.