ArticleJournal of veterinary research2021
Prevalence of
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Pulsed Electric Fields as an Effective Tool forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Detection of Toxoplasma Gondii and Risk Factors in Retail Meat in Southern Mexico.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Article
- A Review ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Microbial Risks Caused by Livestock Excrement: Current Research Status and Prospects.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Molecular prevalence and genetic diversity ofOpen veterinary journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMATERIAL AND
methodsFor the first time in Spain, a survey was undertaken in commercial retail free-range poultry. A total of 50 thighs from different animals were analysed. The samples were homogenised and an acid pepsin digestion procedure was applied prior to molecular analysis.
resultsDNA extracted from 5 out of 50 tissue samples was positive for both genes by qPCR amplification.
conclusionThe 10% prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.