ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2022
Fourth-generation glucose sensors composed of copper nanostructures for diabetes management: A critical review.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterials for biomarker imaging and detection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Electrochemical and Nanomaterial-Based Strategies for Nonenzymatic Glucose Detection: A Review.ChemistryOpen · 2025Review
- Nanostructured Materials in Glucose Biosensing: From Fundamentals to Smart Healthcare Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Biofouling-resistant nanomaterials for non-enzymatic glucose sensors: A critical review.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- New cobalt hydroxycarbonate-based material for highly sensitive enzyme-free glucose sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The OÆSE endstation at BESSY II: operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy for energy materials.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- Article
- Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for the Detection of COVID-19.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Advancements of Glucose Monitoring Biosensor: Current State, Generations of Technological Progress and Innovation Dynamics.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in glucose monitoring utilizing oxidase electrochemical biosensors integrating carbon-based nanomaterials and smart enzyme design.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Microfibrous Carbon Paper Decorated with High-Density Manganese Dioxide Nanorods: An Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Platform of Glucose Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Revolutionizing Glucose Monitoring: Enzyme-Free 2D-MoSACS omega · 2024Article
- State of the art and future research directions of materials science applied to electrochemical biosensor developments.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Review
- CTAB-Modulated Electroplating of Copper Micropillar Arrays for Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensing with Improved Sensitivity.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diabetes Management by Fourth-Generation Glucose Sensors Based on Lemon-Extract-Supported CuO Nanoporous Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Novel Approaches to Enzyme-Based Electrochemical Nanobiosensors.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Progress of Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Glucose Biosensor Based on Nanomaterial-Modified Electrode.Biosensors · 2022Review
- MOF derived core-shell CuO/C with temperature-controlled oxygen-vacancy for real time analysis of glucose.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- A Review on Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Biosensors of Glucose Using Carbon Nanofiber Nanocomposites.Biosensors · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than five decades have been invested in understanding glucose biosensors. Yet, this immensely versatile field has continued to gain attention from the scientific world to better understand and diagnose diabetes. However, such extensive work done to improve glucose sensing devices has still not yielded desirable results. Drawbacks like the necessity of the invasive finger-pricking step and the lack of optimization of diagnostic interventions still need to be considered to improve the testing process of diabetic patients. To upgrade the glucose-sensing devices and reduce the number of intermediary steps during glucose measurement, fourth-generation glucose sensors (FGGS) have been introduced. These sensors, made using robust electrocatalytic copper nanostructures, improve diagnostic efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This review aims to present the essential scientific progress in copper nanostructure-based FGGS in the past 10 years (2010 to present). After a short introduction, we presented the working principles of these sensors. We then highlighted the importance of copper nanostructures as advanced electrode materials to develop reliable real-time FGGS. Finally, we cover the advantages, shortcomings, and prospects for developing highly sensitive, stable, and specific FGGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.