Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111945›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2022

Oral drug delivery for immunoengineering.

Tien Le, Brian Aguilar, Joslyn L Mangal, Abhinav P Acharya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Oral drug delivery for immunoengineering.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tien LeChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6824-6838
Brian AguilarBiomedical Engineering, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.
Joslyn L MangalBiological Design, School for Biological and Health Systems Engineering Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.
Abhinav P AcharyaChemical Engineering, School for the Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2764
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Biomaterials-based metabolic rescue of dendritic cells for vaccine designR01AI155907 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ACHARYA, ABHINAV · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
Local immunometabolism modulating biomaterials for immunosuppressive applicationsR01AR078343 · NIAMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ACHARYA, ABHINAV · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155907NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systemic pharmacotherapeutic efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs is heavily influenced by its route of administration. A few common routes for the systemic delivery of immunotherapeutics are intravenous, intraperitoneal, and intramuscular injections. However, the development of novel biomaterials, in adjunct to current progress in immunoengineering, is providing an exciting area of interest for oral drug delivery for systemic targeting. Oral immunotherapeutic delivery is a highly preferred route of administration due to its ease of administration, higher patient compliance, and increased ability to generate specialized immune responses. However, the harsh environment and slow systemic absorption, due to various biological barriers, reduces the immunotherapeutic bioavailability, and in turn prevents widespread use of oral delivery. Nonetheless, cutting edge biomaterials are being synthesized to combat these biological barriers within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for the enhancement of drug bioavailability and targeting the immune system. For example, advancements in biomaterials and synthesized drug agents have provided distinctive methods to promote localized drug absorption for the modulation of local or systemic immune responses. Additionally, novel breakthroughs in the immunoengineering field show promise in the development of vaccine delivery systems for disease prevention as well as combating autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and cancer. This review will discuss current progress made within the field of biomaterials and drug delivery systems to enhance oral immunotherapeutic availability, and how these new delivery platforms can be utilized to deliver immunotherapeutics for resolution of immune-related diseases.

Indexed as

immunotherapyoral bioavailabilityoral immunotherapeutic deliveryoral vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35111945
PMCPMC8780903
OpenAlexW3191115673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.