ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2022
Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.
Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A patient perspective on applying intermittent fasting in gynecologic cancer.BMC research notes · 2023Trial
- Evaluating Racial Identity as a Characteristics for use in Tailored Interventions Designed to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy in Black/African American Adults.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- The Patient Engaged Research Center's Sustainable Funding Framework: A Path Towards Sustainable Patient Engagement in Care and Research Within a Health System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- From engagement to evidence: a scoping review of qualitative and quantitative measures of adult patient engagement in research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap: empowering patients as research partners through a structured training program.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Self-Management and Support Needs of Patients Experiencing Persistent Symptoms Consistent With Hypothyroidism: A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025Article
- Interventions to improve system-level coproduction in the Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Using action research and a community-academic partnership to understand clinical trial participation: a patient-centered perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.Health equity · 2023Article
- "Healing Can Be a Very Jagged Line": Reflections on Life as a COVID-19 Long Hauler.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2023Article
- A Fond Farewell.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis paper was intended to share a flexible engagement model (FEM) for organizing a structure to obtain patient input regarding health care operations and research, provide greater detail on recruitment, retention, and dissemination strategies, and demonstrate successes and potential applications in other health care settings.
methodsUtilizing a pragmatic approach, the Patient-Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health System developed the FEM, a 7-step process to introduce interested patients/caregivers to the patient advisor program and to follow up with placements. PERC developed a meeting evaluation to measure participant satisfaction. Retention and dissemination methods to keep participants consistently engaged included monthly email blasts, an annual patient advisor retreat, and inviting patient advisors to attend/present at local and national conferences.
resultsAs of January 2020, the program had 419 patient advisors. Almost 50% self-reported as Caucasian and 31% as African American; 73% were women, and most were 45-74 years of age. Recruitment methods proved effective, as 85% of advisors were initially engaged through print and digital marketing. Mean advisor orientation workshop evaluation scores regarding content, facilitators, and logistics were high, with all 4.5 or higher on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly negative) to 5 (strongly positive).
conclusionsGiven the FEM's flexible nature and adaptability, PERC has been successful in effectively leveraging the patient voice and experiences in research and health care delivery. Further research could investigate the model's generalizability, return on investment, and how to formally embed its methodology institutionally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.