Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111880›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2022

A Physical Therapy Mobility Checkup for Older Adults: Feasibility and Participant Preferences From a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Dalerie Lieberz, Hannah Borgeson, Steven Dobson, Lindsey Ewings, Karen Johnson, Kori Klaysmat, Abby Schultz, Rachel Tasson, Alexandra L Borstad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05745402 (A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of the Mobility Checkup for Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05745402 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of the Mobility Checkup for Older Adults: Feasibility in the 'Year 1' Cohort

TypeinterventionalSponsorCollege of St. Scholastica, Inc.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsHealthy AgingArmsMobility Checkup for older adults
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Fond Farewell.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dalerie LieberzDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Hannah BorgesonSt. Luke's Medical Clinic, Mountain Iron, MN.
Steven DobsonTherapeutic Associates Physical Therapy, Eugene, OR.
Lindsey EwingsDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Karen JohnsonBig Stone Therapies, Inc., Marshall, MN.
Kori KlaysmatDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Abby SchultzDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Rachel TassonDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Alexandra L BorstadDepartment of Physical Therapy, The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
College of St. Scholastica · USCreative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysical performance measures, like walking speed, identify and predict preclinical mobility disability but are rarely used in routine medical care. A preventive model of care called Mobility Checkup is being designed to reduce mobility disability in older adults. This study had two purposes: 1) determine feasibility and outcomes of the Mobility Checkup, and 2) identify preferences of older adults regarding this model of care using a discrete choice experiment.

methodsAdults over 55 years of age were recruited from the community. In the study's first phase, participants completed a Mobility Checkup, with feasibility evaluated using 6 criteria. In the second phase, a new sample of older adults (>55 years old) were educated about the Mobility Checkup and then completed a discrete choice experiment to determine their preferences regarding 4 attributes of this care model: cost, visit duration, desired education topic, and style of educational graphic.

resultsEach study phase was completed by 31 participants. Of the 6 feasibility criteria, 5 were met. Visit duration exceeded the 60-minute criteria for 13 of the 31 participants. Still, 91% of participants were very satisfied with the Mobility Checkup. Ability to transition positions identified preclinical mobility disability most frequently. A 30-minute visit with no out-of-pocket cost was deemed preferred.

conclusionsOlder adults value knowing what physical performance measurements predict about their general health. Transitions should be evaluated as part of a Mobility Checkup for older adults. Clearly conveyed cost of health care service is important to older adult consumers.

Indexed as

healthy agingmobility disabilityolder adultspatient preferencespreclinicalpreventive careroutine care

Identifiers

PMID35111880
PMCPMC8772607
OpenAlexW4206556973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.