Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111872›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefazolin in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients.

Alison R Novak, Martin Krsak, Tyree H Kiser, Robert T Neumann, Luis Cava Prado, Kyle C Molina, Scott W Mueller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison R NovakDepartment of Pharmacy, UCHealth - University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Martin KrsakDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-7462
Tyree H KiserDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-3999
Robert T NeumannDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Luis Cava PradoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kyle C MolinaDepartment of Pharmacy, UCHealth - University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-5984
Scott W MuellerDepartment of Pharmacy, UCHealth - University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-8199
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative distribution of cefazolin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remains debated. Determining the distribution of cefazolin into the CSF in noninfected adults may allow for further treatment applications of cefazolin. This prospective pharmacokinetic study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefazolin in serum and CSF from external ventricular drains (EVDs) in neurologically injured adults.

methodsBlood and CSF were collected, using a biologic waste protocol, for cefazolin quantification and trapezoidal rule-based pharmacokinetic analysis in a total of 15 critically ill adults receiving 2000 mg intravenously every 8 hours or the renal dose equivalent for EVD prophylaxis.

resultsA median (range) of 3 (2-4) blood and 3 (2-5) CSF samples were collected for each patient. The most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (66.7%). The median calculated cefazolin CSF C

conclusionsCefazolin dosed for EVD prophylaxis achieved CSF concentrations suggesting viability as a therapeutic option for patients with meningitis or ventriculitis due to susceptible bacteria such as methicillin-susceptible

Indexed as

cefazolincerebrospinal fluidcerebrospinal fluid shuntscritical carecritical illnessdistributionpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35111872
PMCPMC8802796
OpenAlexW4200134202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.