ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021
Merging NMR Data and Computation Facilitates Data-Centered Research.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NMRhub: An NMR Data Ecosystem Spanning the Complete Data Lifecycle.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
- RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line as a metabolomic model for analyzing and understanding inflammation processes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Unveiling belowground allelopathy:Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Preliminary Insights into the Non-Volatile Constituents ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protonated Glutamate and Aspartate Side Chains Can Recognize Phosphodiester Groups via Strong and Short Hydrogen Bonds in Biomacromolecular Complexes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Computational Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and their Complexes.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Identification of interaction partners using protein aggregation and NMR spectroscopy.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB) has served the NMR structural biology community for 40 years, and has been instrumental in the development of many widely-used tools. It fosters the reuse of data resources in structural biology by embodying the FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Inter-operable, and Re-usable). NMRbox is less than a decade old, but complements BMRB by providing NMR software and high-performance computing resources, facilitating the reuse of software resources. BMRB and NMRbox both facilitate reproducible research. NMRbox also fosters the development and deployment of complex meta-software. Combining BMRB and NMRbox helps speed and simplify workflows that utilize BMRB, and enables facile federation of BMRB with other data repositories. Utilization of BMRB and NMRbox in tandem will enable additional advances, such as machine learning, that are poised to become increasingly powerful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.