Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111777›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Inflammation-Induced Coagulopathy Substantially Differs Between COVID-19 and Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study.

Mélanie Dechamps, Julien De Poortere, Manon Martin, Laurent Gatto, Aurélie Daumerie, Caroline Bouzin, Marie Octave, Audrey Ginion, Valentine Robaux, Laurence Pirotton and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mélanie DechampsPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Julien De PoorterePôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Manon MartinComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurent GattoComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Aurélie DaumerieIREC Imaging Platform, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Caroline BouzinIREC Imaging Platform, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie OctavePôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Audrey GinionPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Valentine RobauxPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurence PirottonPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Julie BodartPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Ludovic GerardDepartment of Intensive Care, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Virginie MontielDepartment of Intensive Care, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Alessandro CampionPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Damien GrusonDepartment of Clinical Biology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Astrid Van DievoetDepartment of Clinical Biology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonathan DouxfilsDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur, Belgium.
Hélène HaguetDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur, Belgium.
Laure MorimontDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur, Belgium.
Marc DeriveInotrem s.a., Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Lucie JollyInotrem s.a., Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Luc BertrandPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laure DumoutierExperimental Medicine Unit, de Duve Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Diego Castanares-ZapateroPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre-François LaterreDepartment of Intensive Care, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Sandrine HormanPôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Christophe BeauloyePôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUniversity of Namur · BEde Duve Institute · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical COVID-19, like septic shock, is related to a dysregulated systemic inflammatory reaction and is associated with a high incidence of thrombosis and microthrombosis. Improving the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of critical COVID-19 could help in finding new therapeutic targets already explored in the treatment of septic shock. The current study prospectively compared 48 patients with septic shock and 22 patients with critical COVID-19 regarding their clinical characteristics and outcomes, as well as key plasmatic soluble biomarkers of inflammation, coagulation, endothelial activation, platelet activation, and NETosis. Forty-eight patients with matched age, gender, and co-morbidities were used as controls. Critical COVID-19 patients exhibited less organ failure but a prolonged ICU length-of-stay due to a prolonged respiratory failure. Inflammatory reaction of critical COVID-19 was distinguished by very high levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and T lymphocyte activation (including IL-7 and CD40L), whereas septic shock displays higher levels of IL-6, IL-8, and a more significant elevation of myeloid response biomarkers, including Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) and IL-1ra. Subsequent inflammation-induced coagulopathy of COVID-19 also differed from sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and was characterized by a marked increase in soluble tissue factor (TF) but less platelets, antithrombin, and fibrinogen consumption, and less fibrinolysis alteration. In conclusion, COVID-19 inflammation-induced coagulopathy substantially differs from SIC. Modulating TF release and activity should be evaluated in critical COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

coagulopathyCOVID-19endotheliuminflammationNETosisplateletseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID35111777
PMCPMC8801505
OpenAlexW4206247590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.