ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
The diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI in the staging of lymphomas in adult patients compared to PET/CT and enhanced reference standard-systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06777290 (Comparison of Whole-body MRI, Circulating DNA and PET-CT in Staging, Prognosis, and Treatment Response in Patients with Diffuse Large Cell B Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Whole-body MRI, Circulating DNA and PET-CT in Staging, Prognosis, and Treatment Response in Patients with Diffuse Large Cell B Lymphoma
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Imaging and pathological characteristics of hepatosplenic EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The Role of Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Lymphoma: A Narrative Review.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMorphology highlighted by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the basis of whole-body MRI (wbMRI). The aim of this study was to analyze current knowledge on the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the pretreatment staging of patients with lymphoma.
methodsA search for original articles reporting the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of pretreatment (first staging or staging in relapsed patients after complete remission) wbMRI in nodal and extranodal involvement by extracranial lymphoma and the agreement of stage by the Cotswolds-modified Ann Arbor classification in adult patients compared to the reference standard (PET/CT or enhanced reference standard) was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov.
resultsAltogether 15 studies with 519 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00). For nodal staging, most studies used the size criterion of 10 mm in the short diameter (n=10) and the absence of prominent fatty hilum (n=4). Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging as a sign of nodal involvement was either not used (n=5), used for detection (n=4), semi-quantitatively (n=4), or quantitatively (n=1). Only one study (7) relied solely on restricted diffusion as the main criterion for nodal involvement. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for extranodal involvement were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00). Seven studies considered diffuse splenic involvement when its long or vertical axis was greater than 13 cm regardless of the patient's physiognomy. The pooled agreement in staging (Cohen's kappa) was almost perfect (0.90, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95). DISCUSSION: The sensitivity and specificity of wbMRI in the assessment of the nodal and extranodal involvement by lymphoma is high. The agreement of wbMRI with the reference standard is almost perfect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.