Application of real-time shear wave elastography in the assessment of male infertility.

backgroundShear wave elastography (SWE) is recognized as a suitable imaging modality for identifying and characterizing testicular diseases. Recent exploration of SWE has focused on its feasibility in evaluating histopathological changes in the testicular parenchyma, with researchers increasingly focusing on the relationship between testicular stiffness and male fertility. In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of SWE for distinguishing the relationship between spermatogenic defects and testicular stiffness in males of reproductive age.

methodsThis was a single center, cross-sectional study conducted from July 2017 to December 2019. A total of 1,116 consecutive patients who were voluntarily participating in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-assisted conception at our hospital were recruited to the study. The cohort included 497 normozoospermia patients (Group I), 335 with normozoospermia and decreased motility and agglutination (Group II), 138 with oligozoospermia (Group III), 105 with non-obstructive azoospermia (Group-NOA), and 41 with obstructive azoospermia (Group-OA). We conducted SWE of each participant's testes and the testicular elastic modulus was calculated. The differences of testicular elastic modulus were compared among groups. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between sperm concentration and either testicular volume or testicular elastic modulus. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the maximum elastic modulus (Emax), mean elastic modulus (Emean), and maximum minus the minimum elastic modulus {E[max-min]}.

resultsThe Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] increased gradually in groups I, II, III, and Group-NOA, with statistical differences between groups (P<0.01). Testicular volume was shown to be positively correlated with sperm concentration (r=0.476; P<0.01), while the Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] were negatively correlated with sperm concentration (r=-0.511, -0.357, and -0.524, respectively; P<0.01). The ROC curves were established based on the Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] and were used to distinguish Group-OA from Group-NOA. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.910, 0.863, and 0.900, respectively. We also used ROC curves to distinguish the severe oligozoospermia subgroup and Group-NOA from other groups, for which the AUCs were 0.877, 0.791, and 0.878, respectively.

conclusionsThe SWE is an effective supplement to routine ultrasound examination and can be used to diagnose and differentiate spermatogenetic dysfunction.