ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Impact of waiting time on hepatocellular carcinoma progression in patients undergoing curative tumour ablation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The impact of waiting time and delayed treatment on the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA feared consequence to delay in oncological treatment includes disease progression. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between waiting time for ablative therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the outcomes of local tumour progression, or new HCC foci.
methodsBetween January 2011 to July 2017, 215 patients with HCC underwent ablative (microwave and radiofrequency) procedures. Demographic information, and duration between diagnosis on imaging and ablative procedure were recorded. Follow-up imaging data were analysed to assess for development of either new HCC, or local tumour progression. The median waiting time to ablative therapy was 42 days, hence, patients were separated into two groups: wait time <42 days versus wait time ≥42 days. Simple cox regression was conducted to explore the association between wait time and the clinical outcomes of new HCC or local tumour progression. Survival analyses for outcomes of new HCC or local tumour progression were also compared between the two groups using log-rank test. All the statistical analyses were two sided and P value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
resultsHazard ratio for local tumour progression was 1.002 (0.996, 1.007) P=0.579, while hazard ratio for new HCC foci was 1.002 (0.998, 1.005) P=0.373. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the two groups (wait time <42 versus ≥42 days) for survival estimates for local tumour progression P=0.346, and for new HCC P=0.680.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that delay in HCC ablative therapy is not associated with significant risk of local tumour progression, or new HCC foci.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.