ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
The significance of dual-mode elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by physicians with different levels of experience.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal ultrasound: a non-invasive method for identifying dedifferentiation of papillary thyroid carcinoma during active surveillance.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for discriminating between benign and malignant breast masses by conventional ultrasound and dual-mode elastography: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Noninvasive ultrasound assessment of tissue internal pressure using dual mode elasticity imaging: a phantom study.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Clinical use and adjustment of ultrasound elastography for breast lesions followed WFUMB guidelines and recommendations in the real world.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of dual-mode elastography for benign and malignant breast lesions and determine whether this technique can improve the diagnostic ability of physicians with different levels of experience.
methodsOne hundred and eighty-three breast lesions were analyzed retrospectively, and the following values were calculated for the lesions with various shells: shear modulus (G), Young's modulus (E), shear wave velocity (Cs), and strain ratio (SR). A random forest algorithm was used to select the optimal modes for elastography. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the diagnostic efficacy for benign and malignant breast lesions. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated to evaluate any improvements in the diagnostic efficacy of physicians with different levels of experience (junior, intermediate-level, and senior) in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions using dual-mode elastography.
resultsThe best-performing mode of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of breast lesions was the A'min 1.0 (Cs) mode (minimum shear wave velocity of the area of interest and 1.0 mm around the area of interest), and the best-performing mode of strain elastography (SE) was the B/A' 0.5 (ratio of fat to the elasticity of the area of interest and 0.5 mm around the area of interest). When the two methods were used in series, results showed high specificity (98%), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) (21.2), and positive predictive value (PPV) (95%). Series means that if SE and SWE were malignant, the result in series was malignant, and that if either SE or SWE was benign, the result in series was benign. When the methods were used in parallel, the results showed high sensitivity (91%), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) (0.15), and negative predictive value (NPV) (89%). Parallel means that if SE and SWE were benign, the result in parallel was benign, and that if either SE or SWE was malignant, the result in parallel was malignant. When conventional ultrasound was combined with dual-mode elastography, the intermediate-level and junior physicians' diagnoses of breast lesions showed a higher sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve than conventional ultrasound diagnosis alone.
conclusionsDual-mode elastography is effective in the diagnosis of breast lesions. The sensitivity and specificity values in this study show that diagnoses made by junior and intermediate-level physicians improve when dual-mode elastography is used, although diagnoses made by senior physicians do not improve significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.