ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Diagnostic performance of a novel high-resolution dedicated axillary PET system in the assessment of regional nodal spread of disease in early breast cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy omission after integration ofCancer biology & medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn early breast cancer, a non-invasive method with higher sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) is needed to identify and recognize more indolent axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). This study aimed to assess whether a novel high-resolution dedicated ALN positron emission tomography (LymphPET) system could improve sensitivity in detecting early breast cancer (clinical N0-N1 stage).
methodsA total of 103 patients with clinical stage T1-2N0-1M0 breast cancer were evaluated by
resultsA total of 99 invasive breast carcinoma cases were included in this study. The diagnostic sensitivity of LymphPET was 88%, specificity was 79%, false-negative rate was 12%, the false-positive rate was 21%, positive predictive value was 75%, NPV was 90%, and accuracy was 83%. The maxLUV was superior to TBR1 and TBR2 in detecting ALNs, with 0.27 being the most optimal cutoff value.
conclusionsThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.