ArticleCureus2021
Improve Communicating Uncertainty in Intensive Care Unit With Patient and Family (ICU-PF).
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between work engagement and healthy work environment among Chinese ICU nurses: The mediating role of psychological capital.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communicating uncertainty with patients and families in the intensive care unit is challenging and requires time and skill to convey the information. This proposal aims to provide a structured path for identifying and communicating uncertainty with patients and families in the unit. The focus is to improve the quality of care and timely communication to meet the expectations and needs of families and patients. The project focuses on the first 24 hours of intensive care unit admission to improve communication of uncertainty. By utilizing the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, the workflow uses a screening tool to identify uncertainty and communicate using evidence-based recommendations and the mnemonic VALUE (Value family statements, Acknowledge emotions, Listen, Understand the patient as a person, Elicit questions) as the standard of care. The workflow can be incorporated during the routine rounds as part of the A-F liberation bundle. The outcome is to improve patient and family satisfaction scores using a validated Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire to achieve a score of 75 or more, which correlates with very good. Challenges and limitations are discussed in the proposal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.