Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111481›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

The Self Sabotaging Vessel: A Case Report and Literature Review of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Esiemoghie J Akhigbe, Ebubechukwu Ezeh, Kanaan Mansoor, Jason Mader, Paul I Okhumale, Melissa Lester

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insights on prevalence and incidence of anemia and rapid up-titration of oral heart failure treatment from the STRONG-HF study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esiemoghie J AkhigbeInternal Medicine, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Ebubechukwu EzehInternal Medicine, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Kanaan MansoorCardiovascular Medicine, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Jason MaderCardiology, Marshall University, Huntington, USA.
Paul I OkhumaleCardiology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Melissa LesterCardiovascular Medicine, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Marshall University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a very rare cause of acute coronary syndrome. Despite the recent advances in the management of cardiovascular diseases, the diagnoses and management of SCAD remain a dilemma. It has been described to majorly affect females of childbearing age, immediately post-partum or on oral contraceptives. Recent cases have also identified underlying connective tissue disease as a risk factor. Since its discovery, only a limited number of cases affecting males have been reported in the literature. This makes our case unique. In this, we present a 31-year-old male without any traditional risk factors who presented with atypical chest pain. Electrocardiogram showed ST-segment changes with echocardiogram revealing apical left ventricular akinesis. A diagnostic left heart catheterization showed multiple lumens in the distal left anterior descending artery (LAD). The patient was managed conservatively and discharged home on guideline-directed medical therapy.

Indexed as

interventional cardiologymyocardial infarctionprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (pci)scadspontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID35111481
PMCPMC8794366
OpenAlexW4200308066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.