Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111479›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

The Cognitive-Enhancing Outcomes of Caffeine and L-theanine: A Systematic Review.

Anas Anas Sohail, Fernando Ortiz, Teresa Varghese, Stephanie P Fabara, Arshdeep S Batth, Darshan P Sandesara, Ahtesham Sabir, Mahika Khurana, Shae Datta, Urvish K Patel

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Caffeine on NFL Combine-Like Tests in Undergraduate Students.International journal of exercise science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Research progress of tDCS in the treatment of ADHD.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Anas Anas SohailMedicine, Aureus University School Of Medicine, Oranjestad, ABW.
Fernando OrtizNeurology, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, USA.
Teresa VargheseMedicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, IND.
Stephanie P FabaraGeneral Medicine, Universidad Catolica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.
Arshdeep S BatthInfectious Disease, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Darshan P SandesaraCardiology, Apex Heart Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ahtesham SabirInternal Medicine, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, PAK.
Mahika KhuranaPublic Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
Shae DattaNeurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Urvish K PatelPublic Health and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Apex Heart Institute · INAyub Medical College · PKUniversisdad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil · ECBerkeley Public Health Division · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Aruba · AWUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects multiple cognitive domains, including impaired attention, hyperactivity, and increased impulsivity. According to the CDC, 9.4% of children between 2 and 17 years old have been diagnosed with ADHD. Neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline and dopamine have been suggested as crucial players in the pathophysiology of ADHD and are often targets of modern medication. Adenosine receptors types A1 and A2a in the brain are inhibited by caffeine: a stimulant known to augment attention by increasing cholinergic and dopaminergic transmission. The cognitive function of attention is also enhanced by the amino acid: L-theanine. The mechanism of action is that it behaves like a glutamate reuptake inhibitor while also acting in the hippocampus as a competitive low-affinity glutamate receptor antagonist. It's also shown to have a neuroprotective effect by its action on the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptors. Our systematic review investigates the literature and clinical trials on the cognitive-enhancing effects of caffeine and L-theanine.

Indexed as

adhdcaffeinegreen teal-theaninel-theanine and caffeinematchamemory reconsolidationmental cognition

Identifiers

PMID35111479
PMCPMC8794723
OpenAlexW4200311682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.