ArticleCureus2021
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Current Management of Hypertriglyceridemia.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To estimate the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), determine the association between HTG and the risk of ischemic heart disease and major adverse cardiovascular events. Lastly, to assess the management outcomes of HTG in terms of the different drugs in the treatment plan. Methods A retrospective, longitudinal study at a tertiary hospital was conducted. All who came in were screened. Patients with HTG (TAG [triacylglyceride] 2.3 mmol/L) in the last five years were included in the study. The data included the demographic variables, potential causes, and the methods of management. All data were recorded in a standard data collection form and analyzed by an appropriate statistical tool, using the John Macintosh Project (JMP) software version 15 (Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.). Results Of 300 patients included, 174 (58.0%) were male, with a mean age of 57.8±13.4 years. Pre-treatment, the mean triglycerides (TG) was 3.2±2.3 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) 2.7±1.3 mmol/L, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) 0.93±0.30 mmol/L, and the total cholesterol (TC)was 5.2±1.3 mmol/L. All the patients have prescribed a statin, 144 (48.0%) received aspirin, six (2.0%) fenofibrate, and three (1.0%) gemfibrozil. At the follow-up, the level of the TG was 2.6±1.3 mmol/L (P=0.001), LDL 2.5±1.2 mmol/L (P=0.006) and total cholesterol (TC) 4.7±1.5 mmol/L (P=0.001). Almost a third (28.2%) developed cardiac complications, five (1.6%) presented with unstable angina, six (2.0%) as non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), three (1.0%) had ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 19 (6.3%) had heart failure. A small proportion (17.3%) had a percutaneous coronary intervention, 27 (9.0%) had single-vessel disease, 12 (4.0%) two-vessel disease, and 13 (4.3%) three-vessel disease. Conclusions Many physicians do not pay attention to HTG in everyday practice, although HTG contributes significantly to the occurrence of coronary heart disease. In our study, the majority had mixed hyperlipidemia. One-third of patients with high triglycerides developed ischemic heart disease. The use of fenofibrate and gemfibrozil was not high. A low occurrence of pancreatitis was noted in our series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.