Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111213›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

DNA Methylation Biomarkers-Based Human Age Prediction Using Machine Learning.

Atef Zaguia, Deepak Pandey, Sandeep Painuly, Saurabh Kumar Pal, Vivek Kumar Garg, Neelam Goel

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Chronological Age.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atef ZaguiaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-3391
Deepak PandeyDepartment of Information Technology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-7163
Sandeep PainulyDepartment of Information Technology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-9635
Saurabh Kumar PalDepartment of Information Technology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1197-193X
Vivek Kumar GargDepartment of Medical Lab Technology, University Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-2153
Neelam GoelDepartment of Information Technology, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-4530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAge can be an important clue in uncovering the identity of persons that left biological evidence at crime scenes. With the availability of DNA methylation data, several age prediction models are developed by using statistical and machine learning methods. From epigenetic studies, it has been demonstrated that there is a close association between aging and DNA methylation. Most of the existing studies focused on healthy samples, whereas diseases may have a significant impact on human age. Therefore, in this article, an age prediction model is proposed using DNA methylation biomarkers for healthy and diseased samples.

methodsThe dataset contains 454 healthy samples and 400 diseased samples from publicly available sources with age (1-89 years old). Six CpG sites are identified from this data having a high correlation with age using Pearson's correlation coefficient. In this work, the age prediction model is developed using four different machine learning techniques, namely, Multiple Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Gradient Boosting Regression, and Random Forest Regression. Separate models are designed for healthy and diseased data. The data are split randomly into 80 : 20 ratios for training and testing, respectively.

resultsAmong all the techniques, the model designed using Random Forest Regression shows the best performance, and Gradient Boosting Regression is the second best model. In the case of healthy samples, the model achieved a MAD of 2.51 years for training data and 4.85 for testing data. Also, for diseased samples, a MAD of 3.83 years is obtained for training and 9.53 years for testing.

conclusionThese results showed that the proposed model can predict age for healthy and diseased samples.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLinear ModelsMiddle AgedYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35111213
PMCPMC8803417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.