Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111162›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2021

B- and T-Cell Responses After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Disease Modifying Therapies: Immunological Patterns and Clinical Implications.

Marco Iannetta, Doriana Landi, Gaia Cola, Laura Campogiani, Vincenzo Malagnino, Elisabetta Teti, Luigi Coppola, Andrea Di Lorenzo, Daniela Fraboni, Francesco Buccisano and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco IannettaInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Doriana LandiMultiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Gaia ColaMultiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Laura CampogianiInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo MalagninoInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta TetiInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Luigi CoppolaInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Di LorenzoInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Daniela FraboniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BuccisanoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sandro GrelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Marcello MozzaniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maria Antonella ZingaropoliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Rosa CiardiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto NisiniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Roma, Italy.
Sergio BernardiniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AndreoniInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Girolama Alessandra MarfiaMultiple Sclerosis Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Loredana SarmatiInfectious Disease Unit, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccination campaign to contrast the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has raised the issue of vaccine immunogenicity in special populations such as people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) on highly effective disease modifying treatments (DMTs). While humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been well characterized in the general population and in PwMS, very little is known about cell-mediated responses in conferring protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Methods: PwMS on ocrelizumab, fingolimod or natalizumab, vaccinated with two doses of mRNABNT162b2 (Comirnaty Results: Thirty PwMS and 9 HDs were enrolled. All the patients were negative for anti-N antibody detection, nor reported previous symptoms of COVID-19. Peripheral blood lymphocyte counts were assessed in PwMS showing: (i) reduction of circulating B-lymphocytes in PwMS on ocrelizumab; (ii) reduction of peripheral blood B- and T-lymphocyte absolute counts in PwMS on fingolimod and (iii) normal B- and T-lymphocyte absolute counts with an increase in circulating CD16+CD56+ NK-cells in PwMS on natalizumab. Three patterns of immunological responses were identified in PwMS. In patients on ocrelizumab, anti-S antibody were lacking or reduced, while T-cell responses were normal. In patients on fingolimod both anti-S titers and T-cell mediated responses were impaired. In patients on natalizumab both anti-S titers and T-cell responses were present and comparable to those observed in HD. Conclusions: The evaluation of T-cell responses, anti-S titers and peripheral blood lymphocyte absolute count in PwMS on DMTs can help to better characterize the immunological response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The evaluation of T-cell responses in longitudinal cohorts of PwMS will help to clarify their protective role in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19. The correlation between DMT treatment and immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines could help to better evaluate vaccination strategies in PwMS.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinationAdultB-LymphocytesBNT162 VaccineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesBNT162 VaccineCD20COVIDfingolimodIGRAnatalizumabocrelizumabpeptidesT-lymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID35111162
PMCPMC8801814
OpenAlexW4205277190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.