Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35111002›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2021

Auditory Brain Stem Responses in the C57BL/6J Fragile X Syndrome-Knockout Mouse Model.

Amita Chawla, Elizabeth A McCullagh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in Cope's gray treefrogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Altered Auditory Maturation in Fragile X Syndrome and Its Involvement in Audiogenic Seizure Susceptibility.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hearing ability of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Auditory brainstem development of naked mole-rats (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amita ChawlaDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Elizabeth A McCullaghDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

Institutional Training in Otolaryngology ResearchT32DC012280 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yuri Agrawal, Sue C. Kinnamon · 2013 to 2026
$3.4M
Myelination Deficits Underlying Auditory Issues in Fragile X SyndromeR15HD105231 · NICHD · OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY STILLWATER · PI MCCULLAGH, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2021 to 2025
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD105231NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC012280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory hypersensitivity, especially in the auditory system, is a common symptom in Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common monogenic form of intellectual disability. However, linking phenotypes across genetic background strains of mouse models has been a challenge and could underly some of the issues with translatability of drug studies to the human condition. This study is the first to characterize the auditory brain stem response (ABR), a minimally invasive physiological readout of early auditory processing that is also used in humans, in a commonly used mouse background strain model of FXS, C57BL/6J. We measured morphological features of pinna and head and used ABR to measure the hearing range, and monaural and binaural auditory responses in hemizygous males, homozygous females, and heterozygous females compared with those in wild-type mice. Consistent with previous study, we showed no difference in morphological parameters across genotypes or sexes. There was no significant difference in hearing range between the sexes or genotypes, however there was a trend towards high frequency hearing loss in male FXS mice. In contrast, female mice with homozygous FXS had a decreased amplitude of wave IV of the monaural ABR, while there was no difference in males for amplitudes and no change in latency of ABR waveforms across sexes and genotypes. Finally, males with FXS had an increased latency of the binaural interaction component (BIC) at 0 interaural timing difference compared with that in wild-type males. These findings further clarify auditory brain stem processing in FXS by adding more information across genetic background strains allowing for a better understanding of shared phenotypes.

Indexed as

auditory brainstem response (ABR)binaural hearingFragile X Syndromemouse modelsex differences

Identifiers

PMID35111002
PMCPMC8802689
OpenAlexW4226277837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.