ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021
Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic infraclavicular approach for minimally invasive neck dissection: an evaluation of safety, oncologic efficacy, and learning curve dynamics in head and neck cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Thematic evolution and global trends in retroauricular and robotic-assisted surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- [Clinical application of retroauricular hairline approach in submandibular gland resection assisted by endoscope].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted versus conventional neck dissection: a propensity score matched case-control study on perioperative and oncologic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck cancer is one of the most common in India. There is an increasing incidence of oral cancer in young patients. Where the primary lesion is amenable to transoral resection for early cancer, young patients are concerned about cosmesis and would prefer a surgical approach that would avoid a visible scar in the neck. Robot/endoscope-assisted neck dissection by retroauricular approach was performed in a total of 28 patients of cN0 patients between June 2016 and December 2019. The duration of surgery, perioperative complications, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed. Robot- and endoscope-assisted neck dissections were done in 15 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 46.18 ± 9.68 years. Twenty-four patients had tongue cancer. Mean time for skin flap raising, docking, and robotic console use was 48.21 ± 7.48 min, 10 ± 3.16 min, and 176.67 ± 47.27 min, respectively. Mean neck dissection time from skin incision to skin closure was 231.79 ± 54.94 min for completing level I to IV neck dissection. The mean number of retrieved nodes was 33.69 ± 12.81. Majority of the patients were highly satisfied with their cosmetic outcomes. During a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 3 patients developed recurrence. Robot/ endoscope-assisted neck dissection was feasible and safe but took a longer time to perform. Nodal yields were adequate and better cosmetic outcomes were achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.