Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35110907›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021

Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer.

Mohamed Abdul Kathar, Prateek Jain, Kapila Manikantan, Pattatheyil Arun, Yoon Woo Koh, Rajeev Sharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Clinical application of retroauricular hairline approach in submandibular gland resection assisted by endoscope].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed Abdul KatharDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Major Arterial Road, New Town, Kolkata, 700160 India.
Prateek JainDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Major Arterial Road, New Town, Kolkata, 700160 India.
Kapila ManikantanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Major Arterial Road, New Town, Kolkata, 700160 India.
Pattatheyil ArunDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Major Arterial Road, New Town, Kolkata, 700160 India.
Yoon Woo KohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Rajeev SharanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Major Arterial Road, New Town, Kolkata, 700160 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3487-3884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common in India. There is an increasing incidence of oral cancer in young patients. Where the primary lesion is amenable to transoral resection for early cancer, young patients are concerned about cosmesis and would prefer a surgical approach that would avoid a visible scar in the neck. Robot/endoscope-assisted neck dissection by retroauricular approach was performed in a total of 28 patients of cN0 patients between June 2016 and December 2019. The duration of surgery, perioperative complications, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed. Robot- and endoscope-assisted neck dissections were done in 15 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 46.18 ± 9.68 years. Twenty-four patients had tongue cancer. Mean time for skin flap raising, docking, and robotic console use was 48.21 ± 7.48 min, 10 ± 3.16 min, and 176.67 ± 47.27 min, respectively. Mean neck dissection time from skin incision to skin closure was 231.79 ± 54.94 min for completing level I to IV neck dissection. The mean number of retrieved nodes was 33.69 ± 12.81. Majority of the patients were highly satisfied with their cosmetic outcomes. During a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 3 patients developed recurrence. Robot/ endoscope-assisted neck dissection was feasible and safe but took a longer time to perform. Nodal yields were adequate and better cosmetic outcomes were achieved.

Indexed as

Endoscopic neck dissectionHead and neck cancerRemote access neck surgeryRetroauricular neck dissectionRobotic neck dissection

Identifiers

PMID35110907
PMCPMC8763986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.