ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021
Outcome Evaluation of Mandibular Pull-Through Approach for Glossectomies.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Functional and Survival Outcomes in Pedicled and Microsurgical Flap Reconstruction for Near-Total and Total Glossectomies.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with advanced carcinoma tongue in the Indian subcontinent have an additional component of submucosal fibrosis (SMF) due to chewing of betel. We intend to evaluate mandibular pull-through approach for total or near-total glossectomy and assessed its functional and survival outcome. Prospective study of 77 patients with carcinoma tongue, who underwent total or near-total glossectomy at our institute, were assessed retrospectively. All the patients who underwent glossecomy through mandibular pull through approach with pedicled or free flap reconstruction were assessed for functional and survival outcomes. Of the 77 patients, 45 (58.44%) patients underwent total glossectomy, while 32 (41.55%) patients near-total glossectomy, 61 (79.22%) cases had operative time ≤ 30 min, 69 (89.61%) patients had margins of > 5 mm, and none of the margins were involved. Flaps were reconstructed with 42 (54.54%) PMMC, 24 (31.16%) FRAFF, and 11 (14.28%) ALT. Five (6.49%) patients had surgical site infections, 6 patients each had to undergo re-explorations and partial flap loss, 7 patients had oro-cutaneous fistula, while 53 (68.83%) patients had no complications/osteoradionecrosis. A total of 94% of patients underwent decannulation, 92% of patients got discharged, and 89% got NG tube removed within 21 POD. Forty patients had reasonably good speech. On the long-term follow-up, 9% of the patients developed local recurrence and 11% of patients had regional/lymph node recurrence. Mandibular pull-through approach had the advantages of good accessibility to the tumour with the least mutilating techniques with shorter operation time, lower rates of postoperative complications, and better aesthetics and based on available data, it is superior to the mandibular lip-spilt surgery for advanced tongue involving BOT and floor of mouth cancers when coupled with SMF surgeries for the Indian scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.