Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35110889›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021

Totally Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Comparison Between Early and Late Phase of an Initial Single-Center Learning Curve.

Michele Mazzola, Alessandro Giani, Jacopo Crippa, Lorenzo Morini, Andrea Zironda, Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio, Paolo De Martini, Carmelo Magistro, Giovanni Ferrari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michele MazzolaDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-197X
Alessandro GianiDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0718-2321
Jacopo CrippaDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-0989
Lorenzo MoriniDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5191-0045
Andrea ZirondaDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.
Camillo Leonardo BertoglioDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5925-983X
Paolo De MartiniDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2395-2237
Carmelo MagistroDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-8153
Giovanni FerrariDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-9046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has not reach a wide diffusion, mainly due to its technical difficulty. Considering its potential benefits, efforts should be made to improve its adoption. Between January 2017 and March 2020, LPD was offered as the primary approach to all the patients with an indication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. The overall cohort was divided into two groups: the early group (EG), including the first 30 cases, and the late group (LG), with the remaining patients. Perioperative data were gathered from a prospectively collected database and retrospectively analyzed, comparing the short-term outcomes of the two groups. In the study period, 52 patients underwent LPD. Among these, 88.4% patients were preoperatively diagnosed with a malignant disease. No difference was found between EG and LG in terms of baseline characteristics, mean operative time, estimated blood loss, and conversion to laparotomy. The overall complication rate was 57.7%, with severe complications occurring in 14 patients (26.9%). Two patients (3.8%) deceased within 90 days from the operation. No difference was found between EG and LG regarding postoperative outcomes. Among oncological patients, 86.7% received an R0 resection, and 13.3% had an R1 resection. The EG and LG did not differ in terms of oncological radicality and number of lymph nodes retrieved. LPD is a reproducible surgical technique that may provide acceptable results in both early and late phase of experience, when performed by surgical team with broad background in laparoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomyMinimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomyPancreatic cancerPancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35110889
PMCPMC8764002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.