Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35110885›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2021

Watch and Wait Approach After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience in the Indian subcontinent.

Reena Engineer, Avanish Saklani, Ashwin D'souza, Supreeta Arya, Suman Kumar, Vikas Ostwal, Anant Ramaswamy, Supriya Chopra, Prachi Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reena EngineerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3893-1287
Avanish SaklaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Ashwin D'souzaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Supreeta AryaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Suman KumarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Vikas OstwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Supriya ChopraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Prachi PatilDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) that have a complete clinico-radiological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) can be offered nonoperative or watch and wait (W&W) management. This study assessed the compliance and outcomes of such patients at our institute. Thirty-six patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancers treated between December 2013 and November 2018 and had a near-complete clinical response (ncCR) or complete clinical response (cCR) after completing NACRT and were reluctant to undergo surgery were included. They were followed up at 3 monthly intervals with a combination of pelvic MRI, digital rectal examination, and sigmoidoscopy. Twelve weeks after chemoradiation, 24 (67%) patients had cCR and 12 (33%) had ncCR. All the 36 patients were kept on the W&W protocol. At a median follow-up of 35 (range 17-72) months, six (17%) patients developed local regrowth, one from the cCR group, while five were from the ncCR group. Four of the six patients underwent surgery for local disease (three had sphincter preserving resections and one had abdominoperineal resection), and one of these also had liver metastatectomy. Two of the six patients refused surgery, giving a compliance rate of 94.5%. Three of the 36 patients (8%) had distant metastasis, one had liver metastasis, one had leptomeningeal metastasis, and the third who refused surgery at regrowth developed lung metastasis. Thus, of the 36 patients on the W&W protocol, organ preservation rate was 80%. Local regrowth free DFS was 92.4%, and OAS was 96% at 3 years. W&W approach after cCR and ncCR to NACRT in LARC is acceptable with reasonable compliance and with good outcomes.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant chemoradiationRectal cancerWatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID35110885
PMCPMC8764012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.