ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2021
Association Between Cystic Fibrosis Severity Markers and CFTR Genotypes in Turkish Children.
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer.Human molecular genetics · 2025Pooled it
- The globalization of cystic fibrosis care.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Genetic and clinical factors influencing CF-associated liver disease: the impact ofMedicine and pharmacy reports · 2024Article
- Allelic hierarchy for USH2A influences auditory and visual phenotypes in South Korean patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare class I/II cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations to class III-V mutations with regards to cystic fibrosis disease severity markers in children. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study was designed as a cross-sectional study in Antalya province, located on the south coast of Turkey. The study included 38 cystic fibrosis patients aged between 0.6 and 18 years. The CFTR genotype of the patients was categorized into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of class I or class II mutations in any of the alleles. Group I comprised 8 homozygous, 8 with unknown alleles, and 8 compound heterozygous patients, and group II comprised 11 homozygous and 3 compound heterozygous patients. The groups were analyzed in respect of cystic fibrosis disease severity markers, such as spirometry, ShwachmanKulczycki score, body mass index (BMI), sweat chloride concentration, chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, annual exacerbation frequency, and severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization during the previous year.
resultsIn the comparison of group I and group II patients, a significant difference was observed in pancreas insufficiency (83.3% vs. 35.7%; P = .005), chronic P. aeruginosa infection (58.3% vs. 7.1%; P = .002), cough severity score (1.7 ± 1.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5; P = .029), number of severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization during the previous year (0.9 ± 1 vs. 0.3 ± 0.8; P = .03), and sweat chloride levels (76.7 ± 15.2 vs. 61 ± 22.3; P = .02). All these values were higher in group I patients. The mean BMI values (15.8 ± 2.2 vs. 17.6 ± 2.8; P = .03) were lower in group I patients.
conclusionThere seems to be a difference between class I/II CFTR mutations and class III-V mutations on the severity of the disease in cystic fibrosis patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.