Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35110176›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2021

Nursing Students' Views and Suggestions About Case-Based Learning Integrated Into the Nursing Process: A Qualitative Study.

Rukiye Burucu, Selda Arslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rukiye BurucuDepartment of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Seydişehir Faculty of Health Science, Konya, Turkey.
Selda ArslanDepartment of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Nursing, Konya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to evaluate students' views and suggestions about case-based learning.

methodThe research was planned by using qualitative method of phenomenological type. Case-based learning was integrated into the nursing process and implemented in four sessions, and then, students' views and suggestions were collected. In the interview, a semi-structured interview form was used, in-depth interviews were made, and the data were evaluated by qualitative data analysis. Phenomelogical approach of Colazzi was used in the analyzes and Huberman method was applied. The COREQ was used to analyze and report the qualitative data. The sample consisted of second-year students in the nursing department of a public university in Anatolia in the academic year 2017-2018. Participants attended the case-based learning program. A focus group interview was conducted with 10 of the participants.

resultsParticipants are 10 students with a mean age of 19.86 ± 0.78 years. A total of 65 opinions and suggestions were presented during the focus group meeting. These were grouped under two main and seven sub-themes. Participants had positive views on the program and gave practical suggestions.

conclusionCase-based learning integrated into the nursing process is a practical nursing method that helps students learn and understand the nursing process better and approach patients from a holistic perspective.

Identifiers

PMID35110176
PMCPMC9476289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.