ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2021
Comparison of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks-A Double Blinded Randomized Control Study.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diffusion and clearance of ropivacaine after serratus anterior plane block by CT imaging: a prospective, single-arm trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Hyperbaric Ropivacaine with Fentanyl for Infra-Umbilical Surgeries in Adult Patients.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine for brachial plexus block: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrachial plexus anaesthesia has been an indispensable tool in the anaesthesiologist's armamentarium. Clinical studies have shown that levobupivacaine and ropivacaine have fewer adverse effects on the cardiovascular and central nervous system making them more advantageous in regional anaesthesia techniques. Less information is available regarding their comparable clinical data. Only a few studies have compared levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for brachial plexus blocks; hence, this study was aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness and nerve block characteristics of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in upper limb surgeries.
methodsPatients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I or II coming for elective upper limb surgeries were included in the study. Total numbers of 62 patients were randomly allocated into two groups, group A and group B. Group A received 25mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, and group B received 25mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine. The duration of analgesia, onset of block, duration of sensory, and motor blockade were studied and compared.
resultsThe mean duration of analgesia in group ropivacaine was 8.33 hours and in group levobupivacaine was 10.23 hours which was statistically significant. Ropivacaine had a faster sensory onset compared to levobupivacaine (5.22 vs. 6.88 minutes). The duration of sensory and motor blockade was longer with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine (sensory-8.64 vs. 10.29 hours, motor-8.32 vs. 9.8 hours).
conclusionLevobupivacaine had longer duration of analgesia. The sensory and motor blockade was also longer with levobupivacaine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.