Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35109909›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Effectiveness of motor imagery for improving functional performance after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Ran Li, Jubao Du, Kun Yang, Xue Wang, Wenjiao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. [Emerging role of brain-computer interface in orthopedic rehabilitation and motor function restoration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ran LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45# Chang Chun Street, Beijing, 100000, China.
Jubao DuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45# Chang Chun Street, Beijing, 100000, China. dujubaofei@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6515-1593
Kun YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45# Chang Chun Street, Beijing, 100000, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45# Chang Chun Street, Beijing, 100000, China.
Wenjiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45# Chang Chun Street, Beijing, 100000, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Excellent Talents Foundation 2018000020124G141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to appraise the effects of motor imagery on the functional performance improvement among total knee arthroplasty patients systematically. We hypothesized a relatively greater recovery in the motor imagery group.

methodsMedline (Ovid), Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to October 1st, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of motor imagery on the functional recovery among total knee arthroplasty patients. Measurements included range of motion, strength intensity, Visual Analogue Scale, Time Up and Go Test, Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, all of which were evaluated before and after intervention. Mean differences (MD) or standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

resultsSix studies with 168 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The SMD of strength intensity was increased (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI = [0.47]-[1.32], P < 0.001). The SMD of Visual Analogue Scale was reduced (SMD =  - 0.91; 95% CI = [- 1.29]-[- 0.52], P < 0.001). The SMD of Time Up and Go Test was reduced (SMD =  - 0.56, 95% CI = [- 0.94]-[- 0.19], P = 0.003). The MD of Oxford Knee Score was slightly increased (MD = 0.79-point, 95% CI = [- 0.31]-[1.88], P = 0.159). The outcomes of range of motion, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were described according to the original data.

conclusionCompared with control therapy, motor imagery in the intervention group achieved an effective treatment for strength enhancement, pain reduction and physical activities improvement. More large-scale, prospective researches are needed in the future.

trial registrationThe PROSPERO trial registration number is CRD42021250996.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansOsteoarthritis, KneePhysical Functional PerformancePostural BalanceRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionMeta-analysisMotor imageryRehabilitationSystematic reviewTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35109909
PMCPMC8811995
OpenAlexW4210282748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.