Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35109755›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2022

Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias, Ana Claudia O Carreira, Vitória Frias Batista, Hianka Jasmyne Costa de Carvalho, Maria Angelica Miglino, Paula Fratini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gustavo de Sá Schiavo MatiasDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-7762
Ana Claudia O CarreiraDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitória Frias BatistaDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5255-4337
Hianka Jasmyne Costa de CarvalhoDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-4932
Maria Angelica MiglinoDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4979-115X
Paula FratiniDepartment of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-4829
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) has frequently been applied as a biomaterial for tissue engineering purposes. When implanted, their role can be essential for partial trachea replacement in patients that require a viable transplant solution. Acellular canine tracheal scaffolds with preserved ECM structure, flexibility, and proteins were obtained by high pressure vacuum decellularization. Here, we aimed to evaluate the cell adhesion and proliferation of canine tracheal epithelial cells (EpC) and canine yolk sac endothelial progenitor cells (YS) cultivated on canine decellularized tracheal scaffolds and test the in vivo biocompatibility of these recellularized scaffolds implanted in BALB-c nude mice. In order to evaluate the recellularization efficiency, scaffolds were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), immunofluorescence, DNA quantification, mycoplasma test, and in vivo biocompatibility. The scaffolds sterility was confirmed, and EpC and YS cells were cultured by 7 and 14 days. We demonstrated by SEM, immunofluorescence, and genomic DNA analyzes cell adhesion to tracheal ECM. Then, recellularized scaffolds were in vivo subcutaneously implanted in mice and after 45 days, the fragments were collected and analyzed by Hematoxylin-Eosin and Gömori Trichrome staining and PCNA, CD4, CD8, and CD68 immunohistochemistry. In vivo results confirmed that the implanted tissue remains preserved and proliferative, and no fibrotic tissue process was observed in animals. Finally, our results showed the recellularization success due the preserved ECM proteins, and that these may be suitable to future preclinical studies applications for partial trachea replacement in tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Endothelial Progenitor CellsTracheaAnimalsDogsExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceMice, NudeTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsCartilagedecellularized scaffoldstissue engineeringtracheal collapsetransplants

Identifiers

PMID35109755
PMCPMC8974223
OpenAlexW4210528094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.