Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108567›Full record

ReviewProgress in cardiovascular diseases

Enhancing participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Focus on underserved populations.

Philip A Ades, Sherrie Khadanga, Patrick D Savage, Diann E Gaalema

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip A AdesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention, Burlington, VT, United States of America. Electronic address: Philip.Ades@UVMHealth.org.
Sherrie KhadangaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Patrick D SavageDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Diann E GaalemaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
University of Vermont · US

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial IncentivesR33HL143305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI ADES, PHILIP A., GAALEMA, DIANN E · 2019 to 2022
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL143305NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly decreases morbidity and mortality and improves quality of life following a wide variety of cardiac diagnoses and interventions. However, participation rates and adherence with CR are still suboptimal and certain populations, such as women, minorities, and those of lower socio-economic status, are particularly unlikely to engage in and complete CR. In this paper we review the current status of CR participation rates and interventions that have been used successfully to improve CR participation. In addition, we review populations known to be less likely to engage in CR, and interventions that have been used to improve participation specifically in these underrepresented populations. Finally, we will explore how CR programs may need to expand or change to serve a greater proportion of CR-eligible populations. The best studied interventions that have successfully increased CR participation include automated referral to CR and utilization of a CR liaison person to coordinate the sometimes awkward transition from inpatient status to outpatient CR participation. Furthermore, it appears likely that maximizing secondary prevention in these at-risk populations will require a combination of increasing attendance at traditional center-based CR programs among underrepresented populations, improving and expanding upon tele- or community-based programs, and alternative strategies for improving secondary prevention in those who do not participate in CR.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationFemaleHumansMedically Underserved AreaQuality of LifeReferral and ConsultationVulnerable PopulationsCardiac rehabilitationMinoritiesSocioeconomic status, secondary preventionUnderserved populationsWomen

Identifiers

PMID35108567
PMCPMC9119375
OpenAlexW4210263987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.