ArticleCell reports2022
Inhibition, but not excitation, recovers from partial cone loss with greater spatiotemporal integration, synapse density, and frequency.
Article in Cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Afadin-deficient mouse retinas exhibit severe neuronal lamination defects but preserve visual functions.eLife · 2025Article
- Presynaptic Changes in Mouse Rod Photoreceptors During Early Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Afferent input differentially regulates establishment and maintenance of synapses in the mammalian retina.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Photoreceptor degeneration has heterogeneous effects on functional retinal ganglion cell types.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Changes in Optoretinography Provide an Early and Sensitive Biomarker of Outer Retinal Disease.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Divergent mechanisms of neural adaptation and instability in the mammalian retina.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Retinoic Acid-Dependent Loss of Synaptic Output from Bipolar Cells Impairs Visual Information Processing in Inherited Retinal Degeneration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Multimodal High-Resolution Imaging in Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Comparison Between Optoretinography, Cone Density, and Visual Sensitivity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- A pupillary contrast response in mice and humans: Neural mechanisms and visual functions.Neuron · 2024Article
- Article
- Neural and Müller glial adaptation of the retina to photoreceptor degeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural circuits function in the face of changing inputs, either caused by normal variation in stimuli or by cell death. To maintain their ability to perform essential computations with partial inputs, neural circuits make modifications. Here, we study the retinal circuit's responses to changes in light stimuli or in photoreceptor inputs by inducing partial cone death in the mature mouse retina. Can the retina withstand or recover from input loss? We find that the excitatory pathways exhibit functional loss commensurate with cone death and with some aspects predicted by partial light stimulation. However, inhibitory pathways recover functionally from lost input by increasing spatiotemporal integration in a way that is not recapitulated by partially stimulating the control retina. Anatomically, inhibitory synapses are upregulated on secondary bipolar cells and output ganglion cells. These findings demonstrate the greater capacity for inhibition, compared with excitation, to modify spatiotemporal processing with fewer cone inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.