Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Oral nimodipine treatment has no effect on amyloid pathology or neuritic dystrophy in the 5XFAD mouse model of amyloidosis.

Katherine R Sadleir, Jelena Popovic, Ammaarah Khatri, Robert Vassar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug repurposing for neurodegenerative diseases using Zebrafish behavioral profiles.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2024
    Article
  6. Cytosolic calcium: Judge, jury and executioner of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and beyond.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine R SadleirDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8310-841X
Jelena PopovicDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Ammaarah KhatriDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Robert VassarDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LEONIDAS C. PLATANIAS · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
Molecular Neuropathology and Mechanisms of BACE1 Elevation in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG030142 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI VASSAR, ROBERT J · 2007 to 2019
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of calcium homeostasis has been hypothesized to play a role in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Increased calcium levels can impair axonal transport, disrupt synaptic transmission, and ultimately lead to cell death. Given the potential role of calcium dyshomeostasis in AD, there is interest in testing the ability of already approved drugs targeting various calcium channels to affect amyloid pathology and other aspects of disease. The objective of this study was to test the effects of FDA-approved L-type calcium channel antagonist nimodipine on amyloid accumulation and dystrophic neurite formation in 5XFAD mice, a mouse model of amyloid pathology. 5XFAD transgenic mice and non-transgenic littermates were treated with vehicle or nimodipine-containing chow from two to eight months of age, then brains were harvested and amyloid pathology assessed by immunoblot and immunofluorescence microscopy analyses. Nimodipine was well tolerated and crossed the blood brain barrier, as expected, but there was no effect on Aβ accumulation or on the relative amount of neuritic dystrophy, as assessed by either immunoblot, dot blot or immunofluorescence imaging of Aβ42 and dystrophic neurite marker LAMP1. While we conclude that nimodipine treatment is not likely to improve amyloid pathology or decrease neuritic dystrophy in AD, it is worth noting that nimodipine did not worsen the phenotype suggesting its use is safe in AD patients.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdministration, OralAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCalcium Channel BlockersFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNeuritesNeuroaxonal DystrophiesNimodipinePlaque, AmyloidCalcium Channel BlockersNimodipine

Identifiers

PMID35108319
PMCPMC8809624
OpenAlexW4210600952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.