ArticlePloS one2022
Translating mentoring interventions research into practice: Evaluation of an evidence-based workshop for research mentors on developing trainees' scientific communication skills.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mentorship as a Mechanism for Equity, Retention & Scientific Innovation in Neuroscience-related Careers.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
- Characteristics of participants in the national research mentoring network studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- How to write an effective journal peer review using a staged writing approach: a best-practice guide for early-career researchers.International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Building stronger foundations: exploring a collaborative faculty mentoring workshop for in-depth growth.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Rethinking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course.Biomedical engineering education · 2024Article
- Helping mentors address scientific communication in STEM research training helps their mentees stay the course.International journal of STEM education · 2024Article
- A scientific communication mentoring intervention benefits diverse mentees with language variety related discomfort.Psychology of language and communication · 2023Article
- Basics of faculty-to-faculty mentoring: A process to identify support and challenges.PloS one · 2023Observational
- How to Do Things With Words: Language Interventions to Improve Mentoring Effectiveness.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2022Article
- Faculty Mentor Training to Change Mentoring Practices at a Diverse R2 University.Journal on excellence in college teaching · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key part of keeping doctoral and postdoctoral trainees in STEM research careers is mentoring. Our previous research indicates that mentoring trainees in scientific communication (SC) skill development increases research career intention through two social-cognitive constructs, self-efficacy in and outcome expectations for acquiring SC skills, as well as science identity. While many mentor training interventions exist, no programs focus on developing SC skills specifically. The "Scientific Communication Advances Research Excellence" (SCOARE) program trains mentors to address trainee scientific communication (SC) skill development as an innovative approach to increase trainee research career persistence. The SCOARE training is a half-day workshop for faculty mentors of research trainees at five sites nationally. Informed by previous research, workshop content focuses on practical, effective mentoring strategies to develop trainee speaking and writing skills. Anonymous evaluation data collected after each workshop indicates participant satisfaction and reported positive increases in skills and knowledge in applying new and various techniques when mentoring trainees (skills) and how linguistic bias influences our perception of others (knowledge). This article outlines the research-based development of the SCOARE program, the first two years' of workshop evaluations showing positive increases in skills and knowledge, and lessons learned to increase participant satisfaction with the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.