Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Translating mentoring interventions research into practice: Evaluation of an evidence-based workshop for research mentors on developing trainees' scientific communication skills.

Erin K Dahlstrom, Christine Bell, Shine Chang, Hwa Young Lee, Cheryl B Anderson, Annie Pham, Christine Maidl Pribbenow, Carrie A Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rethinking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course.Biomedical engineering education · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin K DahlstromDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-6710
Christine BellWisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Shine ChangDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-9697
Hwa Young LeeDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Cheryl B AndersonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-9953
Annie PhamDivision of Social Science, Behavioral Research Laboratory, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Christine Maidl PribbenowWisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Carrie A CameronDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-9538

Funding

Scientific Communication Advances Research Excellence (SCOARE) 2.0R25GM125640 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Carrie A. Cameron · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
Building a Diverse Biomedical Workforce Through Communication Across DifferenceU01GM132219 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CAMERON, CARRIE A., UNGUEZ, GRACIELA ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key part of keeping doctoral and postdoctoral trainees in STEM research careers is mentoring. Our previous research indicates that mentoring trainees in scientific communication (SC) skill development increases research career intention through two social-cognitive constructs, self-efficacy in and outcome expectations for acquiring SC skills, as well as science identity. While many mentor training interventions exist, no programs focus on developing SC skills specifically. The "Scientific Communication Advances Research Excellence" (SCOARE) program trains mentors to address trainee scientific communication (SC) skill development as an innovative approach to increase trainee research career persistence. The SCOARE training is a half-day workshop for faculty mentors of research trainees at five sites nationally. Informed by previous research, workshop content focuses on practical, effective mentoring strategies to develop trainee speaking and writing skills. Anonymous evaluation data collected after each workshop indicates participant satisfaction and reported positive increases in skills and knowledge in applying new and various techniques when mentoring trainees (skills) and how linguistic bias influences our perception of others (knowledge). This article outlines the research-based development of the SCOARE program, the first two years' of workshop evaluations showing positive increases in skills and knowledge, and lessons learned to increase participant satisfaction with the program.

Indexed as

MentoringProgram EvaluationCommunicationCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35108289
PMCPMC8809591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.