Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108278›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Social dynamics of core members in mixed-species bird flocks change across a gradient of foraging habitat quality.

Katherine E Gentry Richardson, Daniel P Roche, Stephen G Mugel, Nolan D Lancaster, Kathryn E Sieving, Todd M Freeberg, Jeffrey R Lucas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mixed-species groups and the question of dominance in the social ecosystem.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine E Gentry RichardsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0006-7403
Daniel P RocheDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Stephen G MugelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Nolan D LancasterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Kathryn E SievingDepartment of Wildlife Ecology & Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Todd M FreebergDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Jeffrey R LucasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social associations within mixed-species bird flocks can promote information flow about food availability and provide predator avoidance benefits. The relationship between flocking propensity, foraging habitat quality, and interspecific competition can be altered by human-induced habitat degradation. Here we take a close look at sociality within two ecologically important flock-leader (core) species, the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), to better understand how degradation of foraging habitat quality affects mixed-species flocking dynamics. We compared interactions of free ranging wild birds across a gradient of foraging habitat quality in three managed forest remnants. Specifically, we examined aspects of the social network at each site, including network density, modularity, and species assortativity. Differences in the social networks between each end of our habitat gradient suggest that elevated levels of interspecific association are more valuable in the habitat with low quality foraging conditions. This conclusion is supported by two additional findings: First, foraging height for the subordinate Carolina chickadee relative to the tufted titmouse decreased with an increase in the number of satellite species in the most disturbed site but not in the other two sites. Second, the chickadee gargle call rate, an acoustic signal emitted during agonistic encounters between conspecifics, was relatively higher at the high-quality site. Collectively, these results suggest an increase in heterospecific associations increases the value of cross-species information flow in degraded habitats.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsEcosystemPasseriformesSeasonsSongbirds

Identifiers

PMID35108278
PMCPMC8809581
OpenAlexW4210364340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.