Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108195›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Genetically engineered insects with sex-selection and genetic incompatibility enable population suppression.

Ambuj Upadhyay, Nathan R Feltman, Adam Sychla, Anna Janzen, Siba R Das, Maciej Maselko, Michael Smanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of antibiotics on theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ambuj UpadhyayDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Nathan R FeltmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Adam SychlaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Anna JanzenDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Siba R DasDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Maciej MaselkoDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.
Michael SmanskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-8326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered Genetic Incompatibility (EGI) is a method to create species-like barriers to sexual reproduction. It has applications in pest control that mimic Sterile Insect Technique when only EGI males are released. This can be facilitated by introducing conditional female-lethality to EGI strains to generate a sex-sorting incompatible male system (SSIMS). Here, we demonstrate a proof of concept by combining tetracycline-controlled female lethality constructs with a

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic EngineeringInfertilityMaleD. melanogasterengineered genetic incompatibilitygenetic biocontrolgeneticsgenomicsinsect biotechnologypopulation suppression

Identifiers

PMID35108195
PMCPMC8860436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.