Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108167›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2022

Examining implementation of an intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in a refugee camp setting.

M Claire Greene, Thea Scognamiglio, Samuel L Likindikoki, Lusia Misinzo, Tasiana Njau, Annie Bonz, Peter Ventevogel, Jessie K K Mbwambo, Wietse A Tol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M Claire GreeneProgram on Forced Migration and Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Thea ScognamiglioJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Samuel L LikindikokiDepartment of Psychiatry, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lusia MisinzoDepartment of Psychiatry, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tasiana NjauDepartment of Psychiatry, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Annie BonzHIAS, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Peter VentevogelPublic Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3567-8861
Jessie K K MbwamboDepartment of Psychiatry, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Wietse A TolGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Optimizing implementation of evidence-based mental health interventions to promote reach and retention among migrants in transit in humanitarian emergenciesK01MH129572 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Martha Claire Greene · 2022 to 2026
$880k
Department of HealthNIMH NIH HHS K01 MH129572NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH120659Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An integrated approach to reduce intimate partner violence and improve mental health in humanitarian settings requires coordination across health and protection services. We developed and tested the Nguvu intervention, which combined evidence-based interventions for psychological distress and intimate partner violence among Congolese refugee women in Nyarugusu refugee camp (Tanzania). We conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with Nguvu participants and stakeholders to explore the relevance, acceptability, feasibility, and impact of this intervention. Participants reported that the intervention aligned with needs and filled a gap in programming, yet further adaptations may improve the fit of the intervention. The Nguvu intervention was acceptable to participants, including group discussion of sensitive topics. Confidentiality was highly regarded among staff and participants, which improved safety and acceptability. It was feasible to train non-specialist refugee workers to deliver the intervention with adequate supervision. Facilitators noted contextual challenges that made it difficult to implement the intervention: limited infrastructure, competing priorities, and population mobility. The intervention was perceived to improve awareness of the association between violence and mental health, reduce self-blame, and build skills to improve wellbeing. Recommended adaptations reveal promising, yet challenging future directions for addressing social determinants of mental health and implementing multi-sectoral programmes in complex humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolencePsychological DistressRefugeesFemaleHumansRefugee CampsViolenceimplementation scienceintimate partner violenceMental healthprocess evaluationrefugee health

Identifiers

PMID35108167
PMCPMC10231979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.