ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022
Combining Microscopy Assays of Bacteria-Surface Interactions To Better Evaluate Antimicrobial Polymer Coatings.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing polyallophanate powder coating performance and function with colloidal lignin particles.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Materials: Influence of the Type and Conditions of Biological Tests on the Measured Antibacterial Activity.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2024Article
- PreventingACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers: Versatile Strategies to Combat Bacterial Biofilm Formation.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Validation of the antimicrobial performance of contact-killing polymer surfaces through the experimental determination of bacterial adhesion or viability, is essential for their targeted development and application. However, there is not yet a consensus on the single most appropriate evaluation method or procedure. Combining and benchmarking previously reported assays could reduce the significant variation and misinterpretation of efficacy data obtained from different methods. In this work, we systematically investigated the response of bacterial cells to antiadhesive and antiseptic polymer coatings by combining (i) bulk solution-based, (ii) thin-film spacer-based, and (iii) direct-contact assays. In addition, we evaluated the studied assays using a five-point scoring framework that highlights key areas for improvement. Our data suggest that combined microscopy assays provide a more comprehensive representation of antimicrobial performance, thereby helping to identify effective types of antibacterial polymer coatings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.