Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35108033›Full record

SynthesisJCO precision oncology2022

Clinical Utility of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Sarcoma: Successes and Future Challenges.

Jocelyn Y Hsu, Nathan D Seligson, John L Hays, Wayne O Miles, James L Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JCO precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Choosing the right animal model for sarcoma research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  9. Prognostic Implications of MDM2 and CDK4 Co-amplification in Liposarcoma: Insights from FISH analysis for Translational Oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jocelyn Y HsuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Nathan D SeligsonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
John L HaysDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Wayne O MilesDepartment of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-5206
James L ChenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-5202
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

The translation regulation of pro-apoptotic genesR01CA251753 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MILES, WAYNE · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSoft tissue and bone sarcomas are rare malignancies that exhibit significant pathologic and molecular heterogeneity. Deregulation of the CDKN2A-CCND-CDK4/6-retinoblastoma 1 (Rb) pathway is frequently observed in about 25% of unselected sarcomas and is pathognomonic for specific sarcoma subtypes. This genomic specificity has fueled the clinical evaluation of selective CDK4/6 inhibitors in sarcomas. Here, we highlight successes, opportunities, and future challenges for using CDK4/6 inhibitors to treat sarcoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis review summarizes the current evidence for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in sarcoma while identifying molecular rationale and predictive biomarkers that provide the foundation for targeting the CDK4/6 pathway in sarcoma. A systematic review was performed of articles indexed in the PubMed database and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov). For each sarcoma subtype, we discuss the preclinical rationale, case reports, and available clinical trials data.

resultsDespite promising clinical outcomes in a subset of sarcomas, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors results in highly heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Current clinical data support the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in subsets of sarcoma primarily driven by CDK4/6 deregulation. When dysregulation of the Rb pathway is a secondary driver of sarcoma, combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibition may be an option. Developing strategies to identify responders and the mechanisms that drive resistance is important to maximize the clinical utility of these drugs in patients with sarcoma. Potential biomarkers that indicate CDK4/6 inhibitor sensitivity in sarcoma include

conclusionCDK4/6 inhibitors represent a major breakthrough for targeted cancer treatment. CDK4/6 inhibitor use in sarcoma has led to limited, but significant, early clinical success. Targeted future clinical research will be key to unlocking the potential of CDK4/6 inhibition in sarcoma.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6SarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicGenomicsHumansUnited StatesCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6

Identifiers

PMID35108033
PMCPMC8820917
OpenAlexW4210670463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.