ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2022
A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail-out bowel cancer screening.
Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial aspects of early detection in type 1 diabetes: Language matters, decision making and support needs.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- Review
- Understanding the mechanisms underlying the socioeconomic disparities in cancer screening among Australian women.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Co-designing planning interventions to facilitate participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Observational
- Evaluating changes to home bowel cancer screening kits: an end-user perspective study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Article
- A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail-out bowel cancer screening.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theory-based, user-informed interventions are needed to increase the low participation rates of population-based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) bowel cancer screening. This study investigated the theoretical fit of the health action process approach (HAPA) for home FOBT screening and measured screening invitees' attitudes towards different intervention strategies. A cross-sectional sample (n = 377), aged 50-74 years, participated in this study. Two scales were created for this study. The process approach to mail-out screening (PAMS) scale measured HAPA constructs, and the user ratings of mail-out screening interventions (UR-MSI) scale measured attitudes towards different intervention strategies. Structural equation modelling was used to assess the fit of PAMS scale responses to the HAPA model, and descriptive statistics were calculated for UR-MSI responses. PAMS results showed acceptable model fit, CFI = .968, RMSEA = .050 and explained 49.9% of the variation in FOBT screening participation. Positive ratings of interventions ranged from 20.47%, an intervention prompting planning to complete the FOBT kit, to 72.25%, an intervention promoting the positive health outcome associated with FOBT screening. Intervention strategies should be combined such that they target all factors specified within the HAPA model. User-informed intervention design should be used to effectively facilitate FOBT uptake in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.