Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107822›Full record

ReviewThe patient2022

What is the Most Valid and Reliable Compassion Measure in Healthcare? An Updated Comprehensive and Critical Review.

Shane Sinclair, Jane Kondejewski, Thomas F Hack, Harrison C D Boss, Cara C MacInnis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The patient, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07327450 (Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07327450 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team: a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial in 10 Departments of the Ghent University Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2026 to 2028Enrolled360ConditionsDecision Making ,Shared, Leadership, End of Life Communication, End of Life Decision MakingArmsUsual Care Group, CODE II intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. From 'Little Things' to 'Seagulls': A Mixed Methods Exploration of Patients' Experiences of Person-Centred Compassionate Care in General Medical and Surgical Wards.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Further Development and Validation of a Measure of Compassionate Healthcare in Action.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shane SinclairFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. sinclair@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4542-9911
Jane KondejewskiFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Thomas F HackCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 99 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2M6, Canada.
Harrison C D BossDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Cara C MacInnisDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 148543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous review of compassion measures in healthcare between 1985 and 2016 concluded that no available measure assessed compassion in healthcare in a comprehensive or methodologically rigorous fashion. The present study provided a comparative review of the design and psychometric properties of recently updated or newly published compassion measures. The search strategy of our previous review was replicated. PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases and grey literature were searched to identify studies that reported information on instruments that measure compassion or compassionate care in clinicians, physicians, nurses, healthcare students, and patients. Textual qualitative descriptions of included studies were prepared. Instruments were evaluated using the Evaluating Measures of Patient-Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool. Measures that underwent additional testing since our last review included the Compassion Competence Scale (CCS), the Compassionate Care Assessment Tool (CCAT)

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEmpathyHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35107822
PMCPMC9197914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.