Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107817›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2022

An Emollient PLUS Balm Is Useful for the Management of Xerosis in Patients Treated for Cancer: A Real-World, Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study.

Véronique Vendrely, Ander Mayor-Ibarguren, Aline Stennevin, Ariadna Ortiz-Brugués

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Véronique VendrelyPôle Radiothérapie, CHU Haut Lévêque, 33318, Pessac, France.
Ander Mayor-IbargurenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, La Paz Hospital, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
Aline StennevinLaboratoires Dermatologiques Avène, Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, Les Cauquillous, 81500, Lavaur, France.
Ariadna Ortiz-BruguésLaboratoires Dermatologiques Avène, Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, Les Cauquillous, 81500, Lavaur, France. ariadna.ortiz@pierre-fabre.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-0941
Pierre Fabre (France) · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionXerosis is a common skin side effect of current anticancer therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and hormonotherapy. We evaluated the effectiveness of an emollient PLUS containing an Aquaphilus dolomiae extract (ADE-G1) for the management of xerosis in adult patients treated for cancer.

methodsThis real-world, prospective, observational, multicenter study involved 319 xerotic cancer patients, who were prescribed the study product according to the usual practice of their physician. The practitioner assessed xerosis severity and objective clinical signs, and the patients assessed subjective clinical signs and the impact of their skin condition on their quality of life, at inclusion and after around 4 weeks of use. Overall effectiveness and tolerance were assessed at the end of the study. Clinical success was defined by the combination of several of these effectiveness outcomes.

resultsDaily application of the emollient PLUS reduced xerosis severity in 62.7% of patients (p < 0.0001). The mean total severity scores for objective and subjective clinical signs were reduced by 67.7% and 57.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with baseline. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score also significantly improved at the end of follow-up (-56.6%, p < 0.0001). The product was rated as "effective" or "very effective" by the physician for over 80% of patients, regardless of the initial severity grade of xerosis. Overall clinical success was achieved in 73.7% of patients. A trend toward higher effectiveness and clinical success was observed in patients under hormonotherapy. The study product was well tolerated, regardless of the anticancer therapy being received.

conclusionThis study shows that the emollient PLUS containing ADE-G1 is an effective treatment for xerosis in cancer patients, regardless of the initial grade of xerosis and the anticancer treatment received.

Indexed as

Anticancer therapyAquaphilus dolomiaeEmollientQuality of lifeReal-world studyXerosis

Identifiers

PMID35107817
PMCPMC8941027
OpenAlexW4210259907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.