Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107800›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Diversity and inclusion in the legal profession: disclosure of cancer and other health conditions by lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ + .

Fitore Hyseni, Arzana Myderrizi, Peter Blanck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On the Importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act at 30.Journal of disability policy studies · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The disclosure dilemma: requesting accommodations for chronic pain in job interviews.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fitore HyseniMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.
Arzana MyderriziRockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, USA.
Peter BlanckBurton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, 950 Irving Avenue, Suite 446, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. pblanck@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-1527
Syracuse University · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90DP0076ACL HHS 90DP0090ACL HHS 90DPAD0005ACL HHS 90RTEM0006NCCDPHP CDC HHS K01 DP000090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven the training and experience of lawyers, we assumed that a study of lawyers' willingness to disclose disability in the workplace would provide an example of the actions of a group knowledgeable about disability law. The current study accounts for the effect of visibility of disability, onset and type of disability, and whether the lawyer has made an accommodation request. We also investigate the role of other individual characteristics, such as sexual orientation, gender identity, race/ethnicity, age, and job-related characteristics, in willingness to disclose.

methodsWe use data from the first phase of a longitudinal national survey of lawyers in the USA to estimate the odds of disclosing disability to co-workers, management, and clients using proportional odds models.

resultsLawyers with less visible disabilities, those with mental health disabilities, and those who work for smaller organizations have lower odds of disclosing to co-workers, management, and clients as compared to their counterparts. Attorneys who have requested accommodations are more willing to disclose as compared to those who have not, but only to co-workers and management. Women are less likely than men to disclose to management and clients. However, gender is not a significant determinant of disclosure to co-workers. Older attorneys are more likely to disclose to clients, whereas attorneys with children are less likely to disclose to co-workers. Lastly, lower perceived prejudice and the presence of co-workers with disabilities are associated with higher disclosure scores, but not for all groups.

conclusionsIndividuals who acquired a disability at a relatively early point in life and those with more visible disabilities are more likely to disclose. However, such willingness is affected by the intersection of disability with other individual and firm-level characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The findings imply that those with less visible disabilities and with health conditions acquired later in life are less likely to disclose. The relevance of the findings is heightened by the altered work conditions and demands imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsPersons with DisabilitiesSexual and Gender MinoritiesChildCultural DiversityDisclosureFemaleGender IdentityHumansLawyersMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Disability disclosureFuture of laborInclusive workplacesWorkplace accommodationsWorkplace discrimination

Identifiers

PMID35107800
PMCPMC8809243
OpenAlexW4210282930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.