Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107793›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Educational innovation to integrate cancer survivorship in primary care: course evaluation and learner outcomes.

Jayzona Alberto, Stephanie M Smith, Jennifer Kim, Lidia Schapira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of a Cancer Survivorship Continuing Medical Education Course on Learners' Attitudes and Intention to Change Practice.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Cancer Survivorship at Stanford Cancer Institute.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Article
  5. Research contributions from the First Cancer Center Survivorship Research Forum.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jayzona AlbertoContinuing Medical Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1520 Page Mill Rd, Mail code 5190, Palo Alto, Stanford, CA, USA. jayzona.alberto@stanford.edu.
Stephanie M SmithDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3369-7516
Jennifer KimDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lidia SchapiraDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-6543
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the outcomes of an online cancer survivorship course designed to influence practice change in primary care clinicians through asynchronous education that incorporates emotionally sensitive patient stories and practical resources to prepare clinicians to care for cancer survivors.

methodsThe Health After Cancer: Cancer Survivorship for Primary Care continuing medical education (CME) course launched in April 2020. Learners who earned CME credit for the course (n=288) completed a survey that assessed satisfaction, engagement, and intent to change practice. A follow-up survey was completed by a subset of learners (n=47) and evaluated impact on clinical practice. Metrics representing learners' interaction with the course were collected automatically. Quantitative survey data and learner metrics were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative survey data were coded to generate latent themes relevant to learning outcomes.

resultsThe course reached a global audience of learners from the USA and 40 countries. Each patient case had slight drop-offs in viewership over video play time. Learners reported high satisfaction and relevance to practice. Three latent themes were generated from the qualitative data: improve patient communication, utilize course materials, enhance collaboration with multidisciplinary team.

conclusionsThe course achieved its purpose of educating learners through an asynchronous format that showcased the value of using patient-centered stories to close a knowledge gap related to cancer survivorship care. Learners self-reported changes in practice; however, further assessment needs to be conducted to measure long-term impact to clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Educational approaches that prepare generalists and specialists to care for cancer survivors are essential to optimize health outcomes for cancer survivors. Ongoing efforts are needed to increase use of these resources throughout medical training and within the primary care community.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsEducation, DistanceNeoplasmsEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansPrimary Health CareSurvivorshipCancerEducationEvaluationPrimary careSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35107793
OpenAlexW4210332184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.