ReviewGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022
Advances and safe use of energy devices in lung cancer surgery.
Review in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the LigaSure™ bipolar vessel sealer to monopolar electrocoagulation for thoracoscopic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- [Etiology, Evaluation and Comprehensive Management of Hoarseness after Lung Cancer Surgery].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Perioperative Aspirin Continuation in Patients Requiring Secondary Prevention Undergoing Anatomical Lung Resection: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Immunotherapy Era: Navigating Altered Anatomy, Oncologic Precision, and the Future of Integrated Platforms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Case Report: Early diaphragmatic plication for combined phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after VATS thymectomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Techniques for dividing incomplete pulmonary interlobar fissure using bipolar soft coagulation forceps in robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Surgical technique for uniportal VATS right S10 segmentectomy with the pulmonary ligament approach, performing the intersegmental division last.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical outcomes and learning curve of complex versus simple segmentectomy for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an initial experience of 100 cases of a single experienced surgeon.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Physics at the Cutting Edge: The Essential Science Behind Thoracic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Early chest tube removal within 6 hours after thoracic surgery results in improved postoperative prognosis and no adverse effects.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Examination of resistance of various methods of pulmonary vessel occlusion to hydrostatic pressure.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Factors affecting insulation failure in reusable surgical devices.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identification of Factors Related to the Quality of Lymphadenectomy for Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Prospective Randomized Trial Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Experiences of novel cotton device for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: CS Two-Way HandleJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA clear understanding of energy devices would help achieve high effectiveness and safety and guide the selection of devices. The present review aimed to elucidate the efficacy and adverse events of energy devices in lung cancer to guide the selection of appropriate devices depending on the situation.
methodsFour major databases were searched electronically for relevant articles published until 16 April 2021. The reference lists of the identified papers were examined. We excluded (1) irrelevant studies, (2) manuscripts published in languages other than English and Japanese, (3) duplicates, and (4) studies for which the full text was not available in the databases. The results and key information obtained were summarized by means of a narrative approach.
resultsA total of 78 papers were included in the review and these were categorized according to the main topic of investigation as follows: (1) electrosurgery-related injuries, (2) fundamentals of electrosurgery, (3) monopolar devices, (4) bipolar electrosurgical devices, (5) ultrasonic energy devices, (6) energy devices in lung cancer surgery, (7) operating room fire risks, and (8) basic principles of surgery.
conclusionsUnderstanding energy devices could help us use them in a more effective and safer manner. Knowledge of their selection criteria (suitability), merits, risks, and safety precautions relevant to each process of lung cancer surgery could guide appropriate selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.