Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107723›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

Autochthonous Limosilactobacillus reuteri BFE7 and Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF17 probiotics consortium supplementation improves performance, immunity, and selected gut health indices in Murrah buffalo calves.

Vinay Venkatesh Varada, Amrish Kumar Tyagi, Praveen Sivakumara Banakar, Asit Das, Nitin Tyagi, Rashmi Hogarehalli Mallapa, Sachin Kumar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Current research in food science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinay Venkatesh Varada *Rumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Amrish Kumar TyagiRumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Praveen Sivakumara BanakarRumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Asit DasRumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Nitin TyagiRumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Rashmi Hogarehalli MallapaDairy Microbiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Sachin Kumar *Rumen Biotechnology Lab., Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. arensachin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-9450
National Dairy Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have emerged as biotherapeutic adjuncts to combat neonatal calf gastrointestinal disorders. Therefore, they are considered a suitable alternative to antibiotics for maintaining a healthy and balanced gut microbiota. Hence, the current investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of autochthonous probiotics on Murrah buffalo calves. Sixteen calves (5-7 days of age) were randomly divided into four groups. Group I served as control (CT), fed a basal diet with no supplementation. Groups II (LR), III (LS), and IV (CS) were supplemented with Limosilactobacillus reuteri BF-E7, Ligilactobacillus salivarius BF-17, and a consortium of both probiotic strains at a rate of 1x10

Indexed as

BuffaloesProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBiomarkersDietLactobacillaceaeBiomarkersAutochthonous probioticsDiarrheaGut healthImmune statusLactobacillus spp.Murrah buffalo calves

Identifiers

PMID35107723
OpenAlexW4210788146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.