ArticlePediatric cardiology2022
A Combined Analysis of Peak and Submaximal Exercise Parameters in Delineating Underlying Mechanisms of Sex Differences in Healthy Adolescents.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variable Degrees of Exercise Capacity Characterized by Comprehensive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing among Contemporary Adolescents.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Predictive threshold value of peak exercise systolic blood pressure for carotid atherosclerosis among the healthy middle-aged population in China.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Combined Analysis by Peak and Submaximal Exercise Parameters Delineates Underlying Mechanisms of Poor Exercise Performance in Fontan Patients.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- New applications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters characterize age-related changes in exercise performance during adolescence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Surveillance cardiopulmonary exercise testing can risk-stratify childhood cancer survivors: underlying pathophysiology of poor exercise performance and possible room for improvement.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peak exercise parameters are considered the gold standard to quantify cardiac reserve in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). We studied whether submaximal parameters would add additional values in analyzing sex differences in CPET. We reviewed CPET of age-matched healthy male and female adolescents by cycle ergometer. Besides peak parameters, submaximal CPET parameters, including ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), and submaximal slopes of Δoxygen consumption (ΔVO2)/Δwork rate (ΔWR), Δheart rate (ΔHR)/ΔWR, ΔVO2/ΔHR, and Δminute ventilation (ΔVE)/ΔCO2 production (ΔVCO2), were obtained. We studied 35 male and 40 female healthy adolescents. Peak VO2 (pVO2), peak oxygen pulse (pOP), and VAT were significantly lower in females than males (1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 L/min; 10 ± 2.0 vs. 13.2 ± 3.5 ml/beat; 1.23 ± 0.3 vs. 1.52 ± 0.5 L/min, respectively, all p < 0.005). Females showed significantly lower pVO2, VAT, and OUES with the same body weight than males, implying higher skeletal muscle mass in males. When simultaneously examining ΔHR/ΔWR and pOP, females showed higher dependency on increases in HR than in stroke volume. Females demonstrated significantly lower pOP with the same levels of ΔVO2/ΔHR, suggesting more limited exercise persistence than males under an anaerobic condition at peak exercise. Oxygen uptake efficiency in relation to peak VE was significantly higher in males. There was no sex difference in either ΔVO2/ΔWR or ΔVE/ΔVCO2. Combinational assessment of peak and submaximal CPET parameters delineates the multiple mechanisms that contribute to the sex differences in exercise performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35107629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.