Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107593›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Automated segmentation of magnetic resonance bone marrow signal: a feasibility study.

Elisabeth von Brandis, Håvard B Jenssen, Derk F M Avenarius, Atle Bjørnerud, Berit Flatø, Anders H Tomterstad, Vibke Lilleby, Karen Rosendahl, Tomas Sakinis, Pia K K Zadig and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth von BrandisDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway. elivon@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-3835
Håvard B JenssenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8624-1152
Derk F M AvenariusDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4279-7540
Atle BjørnerudDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3486-3141
Berit FlatøDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-9182
Anders H TomterstadDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Vibke LillebyDepartment of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Karen RosendahlDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0135-2169
Tomas SakinisDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5954-7586
Pia K K ZadigDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8487-7843
Lil-Sofie Ording MüllerDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6529-4984
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual assessment of bone marrow signal is time-consuming and requires meticulous standardisation to secure adequate precision of findings.

objectiveWe examined the feasibility of using deep learning for automated segmentation of bone marrow signal in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe selected knee images from 95 whole-body MRI examinations of healthy individuals and of children with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis, ages 6-18 years, in a longitudinal prospective multi-centre study cohort. Bone marrow signal on T2-weighted Dixon water-only images was divided into three color-coded intensity-levels: 1 = slightly increased; 2 = mildly increased; 3 = moderately to highly increased, up to fluid-like signal. We trained a convolutional neural network on 85 examinations to perform bone marrow segmentation. Four readers manually segmented a test set of 10 examinations and calculated ground truth using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE). We evaluated model and rater performance through Dice similarity coefficient and in consensus.

resultsConsensus score of model performance showed acceptable results for all but one examination. Model performance and reader agreement had highest scores for level-1 signal (median Dice 0.68) and lowest scores for level-3 signal (median Dice 0.40), particularly in examinations where this signal was sparse.

conclusionIt is feasible to develop a deep-learning-based model for automated segmentation of bone marrow signal in children and adolescents. Our model performed poorest for the highest signal intensity in examinations where this signal was sparse. Further improvement requires training on larger and more balanced datasets and validation against ground truth, which should be established by radiologists from several institutions in consensus.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdolescentBone MarrowChildFeasibility StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProspective StudiesAdolescentsArtificial intelligenceBone marrowChildrenConvolutional neural networkMagnetic resonance imagingSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35107593
PMCPMC9107442
OpenAlexW4210545554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.